하단의 논문은 서울대학교 아시아태평양법연구소 아시아태평양법 국제교류기금의 학술연구비 지원을 받은 학술논문입니다.
이재민, Skepticism, Unilateralism or Ultimatumism?: Trump Administration's Trade Policy and the Korea–U.S. FTA, Asian Journal of WTO & International Health Law and Policy, Vol. 12, No. 2 (2017), pp. 421-462.
Lee, Jaemin, Skepticism, Unilateralism or Ultimatumism?: Trump Administration's Trade Policy and the Korea–U.S. FTA, Asian Journal of WTO & International Health Law and Policy, Vol. 12, No. 2 (2017), pp. 421-462. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3045781
The existing framework of the global trading regime is now being shaken with the inauguration of the Trump Administration. Trump Administration’s trade policy has evolved from skepticism to unilateralism and now to “ultimatumism”. Under the Trump Administration, existing skepticism and unilateralism have been further pushed to the point where a minimum level benefit or a minimum quantum of interest is set by the United States (hereinafter “U.S.”) and then presented to a trading partner for a guarantee. As a virtual ultimatum is given with the possibility of termination of the trade agreement at issue unless the U.S. demand is accommodated, this new stance can be called “ultimatumism”. Circumstances surrounding the Korea–U.S. Free Trade Agreement (hereinafter “FTA”) offer a viable example showing this trend of the Trump Administration’s trade policy. Trump Administration trade policy, coupled with the prelude leading to the policy, arguably underscore the importance of maintaining and strengthening multilateralism for the global trading regime.
KEYWORDS: Protectionism, Non-Tariff Barrier, Unilateralism, Bilateralism, Multilateralism, Free Trade Agreements
08826 서울특별시 관악구 관악로 1 서울대학교 아시아태평양법연구소 / Tel : 02-880-4119 / E-mail : firstname.lastname@example.org
COPYRIGHT 2015 Seoul National University Asia·Pacific Law Institute ALL RIGHT RESERVED.
개인정보처리방침은 http://aplaw.snu.ac.kr/?mode=privacy를 참조하시기 바랍니다.